Jon Harrop wrote:
> Isaac Gouy wrote:
> > You're probably doing something wrong.
>
> Other people have posted not entirely dissimilar timings for Java and I'm
> doing exactly the same thing on x86_64 where is runs much faster.
>
> Has anyone managed to get Java close to OCaml or C?
>
> --
> Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
> Objective CAML for Scientists
> http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists

Peter Hickman's measurements were displayed on his website before you
asked for the Java source code - they show the current Java program
taking ~2.15x the time of the current OCaml program, on his machine.