On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:57:56PM +0900, ts wrote:
> >>>>> "N" == Ned Konz <ned / bike-nomad.com> writes:
> 
> N> On Wednesday 29 August 2001 01:58 am, ts wrote:
> >> Numbers 2<1
> 
> N> Doesn't this need to be:
> 
> N> Numbers 2&lt;1
> 
> N> to be valid HTML?
> 
>  Try to check the document that I've given in [ruby-talk:20504] with the
>  HTML validator located at http://validator.w3.org/ and see the result :-)
> 
>  My result was :
> 
>   Congratulations, this document validates as HTML 2.0! 

I am impressed. I wouldn't have thought that it is legal HTML to
include a "<" in regular text. This makes HTML-Parsing even more
complicated than
  a) most people think 
  b) should have been necessary

-- 
marko schulz