On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:57:56PM +0900, ts wrote: > >>>>> "N" == Ned Konz <ned / bike-nomad.com> writes: > > N> On Wednesday 29 August 2001 01:58 am, ts wrote: > >> Numbers 2<1 > > N> Doesn't this need to be: > > N> Numbers 2<1 > > N> to be valid HTML? > > Try to check the document that I've given in [ruby-talk:20504] with the > HTML validator located at http://validator.w3.org/ and see the result :-) > > My result was : > > Congratulations, this document validates as HTML 2.0! I am impressed. I wouldn't have thought that it is legal HTML to include a "<" in regular text. This makes HTML-Parsing even more complicated than a) most people think b) should have been necessary -- marko schulz