Matthew Harris wrote:
> I imagine it wouldn't be too difficult, but what good would an SQL92 
> parser be?

I wanted it for the subset of grammar for create/update/delete 
tables/indexes etc - the stuff that some dbs store in data dictionary 
tables, but MySQL doesn't. If the database generation sql was available, 
then the data dictionary information could be reengineered.

Cheers
Nic

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.