How about a "extension compiler toolchain" binary gem?

Curt Hibbs wrote:
> Its more likely that the one-click installer would continue to be a 
> binary
> distribution (with binary extensions), but with an compiler toolchain 
> that
> allows users to build additional extensions from source or, even better,
> provides a known target RubyGems packagers to create gems that require
> compilation.
> 
> Curt


-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.