Curt Hibbs wrote:
> 
> Its more likely that the one-click installer would continue to be a binary
> distribution (with binary extensions), but with an compiler toolchain that
> allows users to build additional extensions from source or, even better,
> provides a known target RubyGems packagers to create gems that require
> compilation.
> 
> Curt

I'm just curious, why would you distribute binaries if you have to provide
the compiler toolchain anyway?

(if we had a build farm, that would be another story)

cheers

Simon