On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 06:07:19AM +0900, James Britt wrote:
> dblack / wobblini.net wrote:
> >On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, why the lucky stiff wrote:
> 
> >I know, I know -- my vision of Ruby's design as unified and not split
> >into programming/metaprogramming, or good/3vi1, or [whatever the
> >opposite of monkeypatching is]/monkeypatching, is hopelessly Utopian.
> >I plead guilty.
> >
> >(Can someone please follow up with a witticism about the Scopes
> >("monkey") trial? :-)
> 
> Well, monkey patching may be an appropriate term for Python, but given 
> that Ruby is more evolved, we need to call the technique  "evolutionary 
> enhancement".

Or, if you want to surround it with an even more positive aura, maybe even
"intelligent design"  ?

-- 
Mauricio Fernandez  -   http://eigenclass.org   -  singular Ruby