On 7/10/06, Marcelo <barberomarcelo / gmail.com> wrote:
> I would LOVE wxRuby when it is done.
>
> This is the last state, from SourceForge:
>
> Development Status: 4 - Beta
> wxRuby  0.6.0   November 21, 2004
>
> Not as near as wxPython 2.6.3.
>
> It's a shame.

wxRuby2 development was really cooking in May and early June. Work on
it seems to run hot and cold. Note the most recent news on the wxRuby
page:

| "June 12, 2006 Updated information about applications written using wxruby
| added to website. wxRuby2 is close to a release quality - please consider
| downloading from CVS and trying it out."

---John

> Marcin Mielzynski wrote:
> > Marcelo wrote:
> > > Oh, yes, I saw that page, but for what I saw, most of them are in early
> > > development or dead. The only one apparently working is the Ruby/Gnome.
> > >
> >
> > The most mature and the most feature-rich is FXRuby. I wrote my master
> > degree using it. It was quite complex application using opengl and swig
> > interfacing with c++. I had some minor problems with it. As can be seen
> > from wxruby homepage, it is also under active development.
> >
> > lopex
>
>
>