jweirich / one.net wrote:
> 
> There has been some talk about the "Ruby Way" of doing things,
> but no one has been able to describe exactly what means when a piece
> of Ruby code is written in the "Ruby Way".

I thought part of the "Ruby Way" was test-first programming/design
aided by a unit-testing framework like RUnit or Lapidary?  E.g.,

  http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?CodeUnitTestFirst

--
bil <http://abweb.larc.nasa.gov/~kleb/>