On Jul 1, 2006, at 8:27 AM, Matthew Harris wrote:

> I don't know if this was posted previously, but I had the idea of a
> Array#to_proc, an example would be:
>
> [9, 19, 29].map(&[:succ, :to_s, :reverse])
> => ["01", "02", "03"]
>
> I've seen people ask questions such as arr.map(&'meth1.meth2.meth3')
> but I think using the Array#to_proc solution is cleaner.
>
> Would this actually prove useful? It would seem that using the normal
> block form would be just as much typing, though.
>
> --  
> Matt
>

This could very soon start to look like line noise:

e.g.
[9, 19, 29].map(&%w{succ to_s reverse})

Symbol#to_proc is one thing (although I don't like it), Array#to_proc  
is too out there, IMO.