------art_64534_292895.1151418115819
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Hopefully I am not confused about the documentation I would hate to create
such a fuss, let us see now:
The official ruby documentation is on http://www.ruby-doc.org/
with a link to the 1.8.4 core API here:
http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/
which has in turn the documentation for class Object here:
http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Object.html and in particular the
documentation on
Object#== here : http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Object.html#M001412
I am copying and pasting this documentation (again ;) into this post:
[BEGIN COPY]
 obj == other => true or false
obj.equal?(other) => true or false
obj.eql?(other) => true or false
 <http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Object.src/M001412.html>

Equality͢t the Object <http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Object.html>level,
== returns true only if *obj* and *other* are the same object. Typically,
this method is overridden in descendent classes to provide class-specific
meaning.

Unlike ==, the equal? method should never be overridden by subclasses: it is
used to determine object identity (that is, a.equal?(b) iff a is the same
object as b).

The eql? method returns true if *obj* and *anObject* have the same value.
Used by Hash <http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Hash.html> to test
members for equality. For objects of class
Object<http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Object.html>,
eql? is synonymous with ==. Subclasses normally continue this tradition, but
there are exceptions.
Numeric<http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Numeric.html>types, for
example, perform type conversion across
==, but not across eql?, so:

   1 == 1.0     #=> true
   1.eql? 1.0   #=> false

 <http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Object.src/M001414.html>
[END COPY]

Apart from talking about the #equal? method it states clearly that
*normally* the #eql? stays  a synonym for  #==  and we can conclude that...


I cannot read!!!!! (in order to stay polite with myself).

ty very much

All my appologies to Alex and Robert and everyone else following this.
I guess I will change my signature to "Trust me I know what I am doing" :(

Robert

------art_64534_292895.1151418115819--