On 6/25/06, Robert Retzbach <rretzbach / googlemail.com> wrote:
> Awesome! Did you find them on accident or did you think about the
> wrapping? Looks cool, and I think we have an equal working algo :>
>
> Matthew Moss schrieb:
> > On 6/23/06, Jacob Fugal <lukfugl / gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > With the 80 column wrap on your terminal, try the following # of rows:
> > 27, 34, 45, 55, 69...  There are others, I'm just picking a few out.

Found one of them on accident, typing the wrong number. Then I started
searching for others...