--ibTvN161/egqYuK8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 12:45:21AM +0900, darren kirby wrote:
> quoth the Alexandru E. Ungur
> >
> > question:
> >
> >     Does this triangle:
> >                                1
> >                             1     1
> >                          1     2     1
> >                       1     3     3     1
> >                    1     4     6     4     1
> >                1     5     10     10     5     1
> >            1     6     15     20     15     6     1
> >         1     7     21     35     35     21     7     1
> >     1     8     28     56     70     56     28     8     1
> > 1     9     36     84     126     126     84     36     9     1
> >
> > conform with the 'proper triangle' definition?
>=20
> Wikipedia* says: "a polygon with three vertices and three sides which are=
=20
> straight line segments"  so I guess the above is a 'proper' triangle by=
=20
> anyone's definition.
>=20

Look at the last row.  It looks off.  Seems that the 1's on the outer ends
are off by a space so that it's not a straight line.  But I'm sure we all g=
et
the point.

--ibTvN161/egqYuK8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEnBS+pXfXwRYlDA0RAtGiAJ4ug/o4iwCA4ModLHCQKHcTyKhaxgCfTGYn
kaKKdIqtLOsJx9h5egzcMMw=
=VFgY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ibTvN161/egqYuK8--

On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 12:45:21AM +0900, darren kirby wrote:
> quoth the Alexandru E. Ungur
> >
> > question:
> >
> >     Does this triangle:
> >                                1
> >                             1     1
> >                          1     2     1
> >                       1     3     3     1
> >                    1     4     6     4     1
> >                1     5     10     10     5     1
> >            1     6     15     20     15     6     1
> >         1     7     21     35     35     21     7     1
> >     1     8     28     56     70     56     28     8     1
> > 1     9     36     84     126     126     84     36     9     1
> >
> > conform with the 'proper triangle' definition?
>=20
> Wikipedia* says: "a polygon with three vertices and three sides which are=
=20
> straight line segments"  so I guess the above is a 'proper' triangle by=
=20
> anyone's definition.
>=20

Look at the last row.  It looks off.  Seems that the 1's on the outer ends
are off by a space so that it's not a straight line.  But I'm sure we all g=
et
the point.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEnBS+pXfXwRYlDA0RAtGiAJ4ug/o4iwCA4ModLHCQKHcTyKhaxgCfTGYn
kaKKdIqtLOsJx9h5egzcMMw=
=VFgY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----