--nextPart2100729.UpHS1u5E0u
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

quoth the Alexandru E. Ungur
>
> question:
>
>     Does this triangle:
>                                1
>                             1     1
>                          1     2     1
>                       1     3     3     1
>                    1     4     6     4     1
>                1     5     10     10     5     1
>            1     6     15     20     15     6     1
>         1     7     21     35     35     21     7     1
>     1     8     28     56     70     56     28     8     1
> 1     9     36     84     126     126     84     36     9     1
>
> conform with the 'proper triangle' definition?

Wikipedia* says: "a polygon with three vertices and three sides which are=20
straight line segments"  so I guess the above is a 'proper' triangle by=20
anyone's definition.

> Thanks,
> Alex

* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle
=2Dd
=2D-=20
darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org
"...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..."
=2D Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972

--nextPart2100729.UpHS1u5E0u
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBEnAxwwPD5Cr/3CJgRAqqiAKCv3frdoMAJsMGF+ScgUyWdnf0f0gCg57xU
1iuDsMFL4IXEhTxqR8EO9sE=
=Lldx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2100729.UpHS1u5E0u--