> -----Original Message-----
> From: transfire / gmail.com [mailto:transfire / gmail.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 11:27 AM
> To: ruby-talk ML
> Subject: Qua(ck)
> 
> 
> 
> Joel VanderWerf wrote:
> > transfire / gmail.com wrote:
> > > In some of my documentation I have found this wording to 
> be useful: 
> > > for "metaclass" it is "class qua class" or "module qua 
> class". For 
> > > an object's singleton class, "object qua class".
> > >
> > > I like quaclass.
> >
> > Actually, for us duck typers, a quaclass is anything that 
> behaves like 
> > a class ;)
> 
> Hey, there's actually some truth to that. The quaclass can be 
> used to make an object quack like another class. :)
> 
> T.

And thus, sine quaclass we could not make an object quack like another
class.

Thanks, I'll be here all week.

- Dan


This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or
privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this communication 
in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy 
all copies of the communication and any attachments.