On Jun 19, 2006, at 10:42 PM, Logan Capaldo wrote:

> On Jun 17, 2006, at 2:58 PM, Dominik Bathon wrote:
>
>> But RubyNode was just a by-product of Ruby2CExtension and it has a  
>> different interface than ParseTree.
>>
>> And Ruby2CExtension is not like Ruby2C, it's more like ZenObfuscate.
>>
>> Dominik
>>
>
> MMm. I'll be honest, I was kind of disappointed. I was hoping for a  
> response like "Yes, but ParseTree has <X> limitation or uses <Y>  
> style, and RubyNode has a <Z> implementation" :). Ah well.

So were we.

*shrug*