Daniel Schierbeck wrote:
> Mat Schaffer wrote:
> 
>> The only downside I've found with Ruby/RoR compared with PHP is that 
>> the PHP documentation is really amazing.  The commented documents are 
>> wonderful, and there's still nothing _quite_ like it
> 
> 
> I'm of the same opinion -- PHP is a lousy language, but the manual works 
> extremely well. We really ought to take a look at it and try to make one 
> for Ruby, perhaps even avoiding rDoc (yes, I'm aware of rannotate, but 
> I'm not sure it's quite enough.)

Two contenders that have caught my eye are RDog and Rannotate, though 
both are flawed.  But both have cool stuff, too.

Both are on rubyforge.org, I believe.



-- 
James Britt

"You harmonize; then you customize."
  - Wilson Pickett