Would `Constant ||= "value"' be a possible remedy?

On 6/16/06, Kirk Haines <khaines / enigo.com> wrote:
> On Friday 16 June 2006 6:25 am, Matthew Harris wrote:
> > I'm curious as to why you're in a position to check whether a constant
> > is defined in the first place.
>
> Because the class(es) may be reevaluated, and I don't want to generate a pile
> of warnings about "Already initialized constant Foo".
>
>
> Kirk Haines
>
>


-- 
Matt