On 15-Jun-06, at 11:35 PM, Austin Ziegler wrote: > On 6/15/06, Austin Ziegler <halostatue / gmail.com> wrote: >> On 6/15/06, Jeremy Tregunna <jtregunna / blurgle.ca> wrote: >> > This behaviour only started a little while ago (couple months). >> I've >> > been subscribed to this list without altering my subscription for >> > over 2 years. >> Correct. I've been subscribed to ruby-talk through various addresses >> and subscribed to ruby-talk just over two years ago when I first got >> my gmail account. The only thing that I'd argue with is that this >> happened six or eight months ago. > > Sorry. I misunderstood. > > Jeremy, have you changed your MUA by chance? If so, does your MUA copy > sent messages -- especially replies -- to the originating folders? It > could be that your MUA is now applying the same filters used in > *receiving* messages to messages you send, too, which is essentially > the same problem as what is being seen in Gmail. No, I've been happily using OSX's Mail application for my mail for the last 3 1/2 years. I use IMAP not POP3 for handling my messages so I can (if I need too) check my mail from other locations, retrieve old messages that I've saved, etc. I have rules set up so that whenever a ruby-talk message comes in, it goes to the appropriate folder and stays there until I delete it. None of my setup has changed in the last .. 7 or so months (since I upgraded to 10.4) and that "change" was just in the version of Mail (newer version, config still the same). I should note that the same rules I use for ruby-talk are also applied to the various freebsd lists I'm on, the GNUstep lists I'm on, and the Io language mailing list -- ruby-talk is the only one that gives me duplicates (for *everybody's* messages, not just my own). > -austin -- Jeremy Tregunna jtregunna / blurgle.ca "One serious obstacle to the adoption of good programming languages is the notion that everything has to be sacrificed for speed. In computer languages as in life, speed kills." -- Mike Vanier