Hi,

In message "Re: Why the lack of mixing-in support for Class methods?"
    on Fri, 16 Jun 2006 01:16:08 +0900, transfire / gmail.com writes:

|> #send must of course be replaced with #funcall in 1.9 -- has there been
|> any progress with the naming of that? I checked the archives, but
|> couldn't find anything never than August '05... it sounds like a "fun
|> call", if you know what I mean... hopefully you don't.

I don't.  Luckily or not.  For your information, 'funcall' is a lisp
function name that has its own history.

|Isn't #funcall now called #instance_exec?

No, they are different.

							matz.