On Jun 14, 2006, at 10:30 AM, transfire / gmail.com wrote:
> Okay, so I'm wondering, will the annonymous module this creates get a
> name of some sort instead of the ususal "#<Module:0xb7ca7e1c>"

I was thinking that the block would just be evaluated in the context of
the targeted singleton class as vs. the context of a new anonymous
module which is *then* included into the targeted singleton class.



Gary Wright