Phil Tomson wrote:
> On 6/13/06, Matt Lawrence <matt / technoronin.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Jim Weirich wrote:
>>
>> > Both RuWiki and Instiki are good choices for an easy to setup wiki.
>>
>> Instiki is no longer easy to set up, it's now a long troublesome
>> installation that I wasn't able to make work.
>>
> 
> It's unfortunate.  Instiki used to be a 'no-brainer' to setup.  It may
> not have been the most feature-ful wiki out there, but for internal
> and personal use it was great.  Now I think they've built it on Rails
> and I think that seems to be overkill - at any rate, it's no longer so
> easy to setup and use.
> 
> You might want to try to find an older version of Instiki that isn't
> based on Rails.  I wonder if the older, pre-Rails Instiki could be
> revived and maintained as a completely seperate project.

You can get pre-Rails Instiki (0.9.2) using RubyGems:

gem install instiki --version "< 0.10"

I'm sure that branch could be revived and maintained separately, but
you'd need someone to take it on.

Cheers,
Dave