I wouldn't say the new site looks bad, but I don't like when the page 
doesn't expand to fill my monitor.  In this regard the old ruby site is 
superior.  I actually really like the current ruby site.

-steven


Kyrre Nygard wrote:
> At 20:26 13.06.2006, BA Baracus wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, June 14, 2006, at 12:11 AM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
>> >See my first reply to you:
>> >
>> >http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/196958
>>
>> Woops...sorry...read too fast. Great! I'm very much looking forward to
>> it going live.
>>
>> B.A.
>> -- 
>> Posted with http://DevLists.com.  Sign up and save your mailbox.
>
> Try not to jump into the same shoe as FreeBSD. They rushed into
> a new website so fast that once they got there, they realized it
> wasn't that nice after all.
>
> Speaking as a graduate from the Royal Academy of Arts in London,
> the current Ruby website looks far better than the new one.
> The new one looks to me like a badly designed approach to the
> whole web 2.0 hype. As they say, if you can't do it, don't.
>
> All the best,
> Kyrre
>