On Jun 5, 2006, at 1:25 PM, transfire / gmail.com wrote:
> Jamie Macey wrote:
>
>> Interestingly enough, Facet's Hash#to_ostruct_recurse doesn't seem to
>> work (stack overflow) for the recursive sample.
>
> Yep. It wasn't designed to handle that. If anyone has an *efficient*
> fix I add it in. If not I'll just make a note of this limitation in  
> the
> docs.
>
> Thanks,
> T.

Is the obvious case of storing references to previously encountered  
hashes really that inefficient?
-Mat