pat eyler wrote:
> On 5/26/06, James Edward Gray II <james / grayproductions.net> wrote:
> 
>> It's a pretty mature library now, has a CSV compatibility mode, is
>> very feature rich (including many CSV lacks), and is wicked fast in
>> comparison.  I see it recommended regularly and get lots of positive
>> feedback.
>>
>> What do others think?  Worth adding?
>>

I'd suggest changing the name to CSV. And possibly defaulting to
compat-mode or perhaps issuing a warning if it's detected that
the user is trying to use the Old Library.


Hal