This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_ extPart_001_01C1210C.0456DC10
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset so-8859-1"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ned Konz [mailto:ned / bike-nomad.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 3:40 PM
> To: ruby-talk / ruby-lang.org
> Subject: [ruby-talk:19447] Re: Help! I'm still confused about
> threading
> in the ML
>
>
> On Thursday 09 August 2001 12:23 pm, you wrote:
> > I'm trying to track down these various message threading
> problems, and
> > I'm coming to the conclusion that it isn't the gateway's
> > fault. However, I'd appreciate any assistance in understanding this.
> >
> > Take messages 19444 and 19445. 19444 was posted to
> comp.lang.ruby and
> > gatewayed through to the mailing list. The Message-ID in
> the header is
> > the same on both the newsgroup and in the mailing list message.
> >
> > The response 19445 was sent in via the mailing list. It has no
> > 'references' or 'in-reply-to' header. In fact it has no
> reference that
> > I can see to the original article.
> >
> > Is this an MUA problem, or is the gateway stripping out some other
> > field that the MUA needs to do the linking?
>
> It sounds like a user agent or user problem. For all you
> know, Christophe
> just typed in "RE: question about ::" into his Subject line.
> Or maybe he's
> using a mail agent that doesn't set the in-reply-to or
> references headers for
> some reason.
I have to use Outlook (I would rather use GNUS but I still have to figure
out how to handle Outlook appointments).
This is a reply to message 19447.
------_ extPart_001_01C1210C.0456DC10
Content-Type: text/html;
charset so-8859-1"
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV
ontent-Type" CONTENT ext/html; charset o-8859-1">
<META NAME enerator" CONTENT S Exchange Server version 5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>RE: [ruby-talk:19447] Re: Help! I'm still confused about threading in the ML</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE > -----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > From: Ned Konz [<A HREF ailto:ned / bike-nomad.com">mailto:ned / bike-nomad.com</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 3:40 PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > To: ruby-talk / ruby-lang.org</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > Subject: [ruby-talk:19447] Re: Help! I'm still confused about </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > threading</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > in the ML</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > On Thursday 09 August 2001 12:23 pm, you wrote:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > > I'm trying to track down these various message threading </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > problems, and</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > > I'm coming to the conclusion that it isn't the gateway's</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > > fault. However, I'd appreciate any assistance in understanding this.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > ></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > > Take messages 19444 and 19445. 19444 was posted to </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > comp.lang.ruby and</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > > gatewayed through to the mailing list. The Message-ID in </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > the header is</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > > the same on both the newsgroup and in the mailing list message.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > ></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > > The response 19445 was sent in via the mailing list. It has no</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > > 'references' or 'in-reply-to' header. In fact it has no </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > reference that</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > > I can see to the original article.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > ></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > > Is this an MUA problem, or is the gateway stripping out some other</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > > field that the MUA needs to do the linking?</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > It sounds like a user agent or user problem. For all you </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > know, Christophe </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > just typed in "RE: question about ::" into his Subject line. </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > Or maybe he's </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > using a mail agent that doesn't set the in-reply-to or </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > references headers for </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE > some reason.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE I have to use Outlook (I would rather use GNUS but I still have to figure out how to handle Outlook appointments).</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE This is a reply to message 19447.</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
------_ extPart_001_01C1210C.0456DC10--