I am going to reply in this thread off-list. If you want to be included, please email me off-list: curi / curi.us and I will CC you. Elliot On May 19, 2006, at 10:00 AM, Dave Howell wrote: > > On May 15, 2006, at 16:03, Elliot Temple wrote: > >> But is every case of piracy deserving of the same great scorn? I >> realise this may be a tangential issue, but if someone can't >> afford a book and is not going to buy it either way, whom has he >> harmed by downloading it? > > Whether he has "harmed" anybody or not is quite irrelevant, and a > false argument (except for purposes of how much extra money you owe > the creator if you violate his/her copyright). US Copyright law, in > both principle and practice, with a few specific and notable > exceptions, says that what a person creates belongs to them. If I > create some fabulous work of art or brilliant programming book, it > is my right as the person who did the making to > give it away for free > give away the right to copy it for free > sell or lease the right to publish it to a third party > publish it myself and charge people some nominal fee > publish it myself and charge an outrageous fee > not share it with anybody but people named "Fred." > > If you don't happen to like what I'm doing with my creation, that's > just too bad. Make your own. The fact that you can steal it without > "harming" anybody because you wouldn't have paid for it anyway (or > I wasn't going to sell it to you in the first place) is a bogus > argument, because it's not your right to decide who will or won't > be harmed by stealing my work. It's my work, it's my time/energy/ > money in the making, it's my right. > > Music, BTW, is one of the specific and notable exceptions; > specifically the performance of somebody else's composition. > There's also a time limit on ownership, which is currently very > long (I believe it's creator's lifetime + 70 years, but I'd have to > check; they keep changing it). Finally, there's "fair use," which > I'd guess about 94% of the people who claim this don't understand, > and which is widely abused. > > > -- Elliot Temple http://www.curi.us/blog/