Austin Ziegler wrote:
> The main reason that Matz has opposed it before is:
> 
>  foo {
>    bar
>  rescue
>    baz
>  }
> 
> It does look odd, but I think people will just get used to it.

I think it looks too odd. The do/end and the curly bracket syntaxes are 
used in different places -- if I needed error handling, I would never 
use the curly brackets anyway. I see the problem, though; I just don't 
think it's big enough to block the implementation of this.


Daniel