On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 04:42 +0900, MenTaLguY wrote:
> On Fri, 5 May 2006 23:38:05 +0900, Ross Bamford <rossrt / roscopeco.co.uk> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 23:23 +0900, st103 / doc.ic.ac.uk wrote:
> >> Surely that isn't possible, some combinations could have more than one
> > possible
> >> correction, eg:
> >>
> >> [{BB] => [{B}B]
> >> or
> >> [{BB] => [{BB}]
> > 
> > Either of the above is valid - the main object of this is just to make
> > sure the packer doesn't get in a mess, and both of those will pass
> > through fine (even if the wrappings aren't exactly as intended).
> 
> Hmm, to clarify, brackets can have non-bracket siblings?

It's technically allowed in the output, but would never occur in a
correct input.

-- 
Ross Bamford - rosco / roscopeco.REMOVE.co.uk