On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 07:36 +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2006, at 3:02 PM, Ross Bamford wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 06:46 +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
> >> On Apr 19, 2006, at 12:56 PM, Ross Bamford wrote:
> >>> As a *temporary measure* I'd be willing to run something like that
> >>> here,
> >>> I have the spare cycles and bandwidth to do it at the moment but it
> >>> would only be until the real gateway got fixed. If there's enough
> >>> people
> >>> want that, I'll get it set up.
> >>
> >> The last thing I need is two copies of every message in my mailbox.
> >
> > I don't follow - does this happen when the gateway is up? A short  
> > think
> > suggested to me it'd just be a case of rewriting headers and sending
> > them on, but to be honest I was kind of hoping there might be an
> > existing script I could fit to my network ;)
> 
> How will you make sure your temporary gateway will stop when the  
> broken one gets fixed?  I'm always afraid of broken software that  
> will annoy me (my current email annoyance is Google Calendar's  
> incessant sending of ics files).
> 

I guess a combination of communication and ctrl-c ... I've not thought a
great deal about it as I say - personally I don't really give a damn (I
still scan the newsgroup anyway) but I thought I'd make the offer. Don't
worry - it's not something I'm about to set up for my own amusement...

-- 
Ross Bamford - rosco / roscopeco.REMOVE.co.uk