On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 06:46 +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2006, at 12:56 PM, Ross Bamford wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 04:02 +0900, TRANS wrote:
> >
> >> P.S. What the frak on the gateway? Why hasn't the person/people
> >> responsable even said anything about it? This is getting old real
> >> quick.
> >
> > I have to admit I don't know much about this subject, but it seems  
> > to me
> > that a gateway just subscribes to both, and posts messages across the
> > divide as they come in, right?
> >
> > As a *temporary measure* I'd be willing to run something like that  
> > here,
> > I have the spare cycles and bandwidth to do it at the moment but it
> > would only be until the real gateway got fixed. If there's enough  
> > people
> > want that, I'll get it set up.
> 
> The last thing I need is two copies of every message in my mailbox.
> 

I don't follow - does this happen when the gateway is up? A short think
suggested to me it'd just be a case of rewriting headers and sending
them on, but to be honest I was kind of hoping there might be an
existing script I could fit to my network ;)

> I also wish the ruby forum gateway would go away, it has reduced the  
> signal to noise ratio a bunch, and a bunch of people post without  
> context making it impossible to figure out what they're talking about.
> 

Couldn't agree more.

-- 
Ross Bamford - rosco / roscopeco.REMOVE.co.uk