Bil Kleb wrote:
>   In Rake's Rakefile, I am puzzled by why lines 176-179 are
>   not replaced by s.rdoc_options=rd.options similar to
>   the way s.extra_rdoc_files=rd.rdoc_files is done on the
>   line before 

Good idea!  I've modified the Rakefile to do exactly that.

>   Jim, in case you read this, there is a typo in the
>   the header comments -> "is may be"?

Yep, typo.  Should be just "may be"

> FWIW, it took me a while to figure out that I needed to use
> 
>   rake package
> 
> to get rake to spit out all three types of packages I had
> requested; 

'rake -T' might help here.

--
-- Jim Weirich



-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.