I tried compiling the native-win32 port of ruby, and it seems
to be working well. Is there a particular reason for discouraging
native-win32 ( except fork(), but system() works, hopefully popen()
should also work.).


--Vardhan
At 11:12 PM 30-07-01, Dave Thomas wrote:
>"Albert L. Wagner" <alwagner / uark.edu> writes:
>
> > Ruby164-2.exe does not work in my Win2k box.  Judging by other
> > posts, it does not work for some other users also. A post from
> > Holger Arndt, July 24, indicates a problem with the version of
> > cygwin packaged with 1.6.4.  Is anyone working on this?
>
>I have the 164-2 program running fine on W2k. I;ve tried it using the
>cygwin dll that comes with it, and also with the latest cygwin from
>RedHat.
>
>Exactly what happens when you try to run it. Do you have any other
>cygwin dlls lying around. Tell us more...
>
>Dave

--
Vardhan Varma <VardhanVarma / yahoo.com> ... till Yahoo is free


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com