On Apr 7, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Ross Bamford wrote:

> On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 03:07 +0900, Simon Strandgaard wrote:
>> On 4/7/06, James Edward Gray II <james / grayproductions.net> wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> These can be quite a bit of fun, depending on what text you prime
>>> them with...  ;)
>>
>>
>> input_text := ruby_talk;   (* hehe *)
>
> I had to try this out :) With 500 messages from the past couple of  
> days,
> order of 3, I found lots of cryptic wisdom when using a small word
> limit, such as:
>
> ===
> windows :\ i guess clarity, just isn't a interesting.
>
> thanks for making def say_stuff puts
>
> bereflected to the foo to design a gui by open source path.
>
> in summary, to get wrote: pointers, or care what you mean.
>
> example, c# guys (including even worse - perl.
>
> warning: pointer targets in boese wrote: use an i'll go digging
>
> +0900, james edward gray would help with reading v_mod/1 m = 'm'
>
> to figure this out? tashiro wrote: you need own license, possibly
>
> april fool's joke. v.- interface and doscommand which next implemented
> anobjective-c frontend set of programming
> ===
>
> I've attached the quick and dirty script I used to get cleaned-up  
> input
> text from ruby-talk archive.
>
> This is a seriously cool quiz :) Thanks all concerned.
>
> -- 
> Ross Bamford - rosco / roscopeco.REMOVE.co.uk
> <rubytalk2text.rb>

Thanks for the script, I note this interesting result with my  
implementation:
% ruby markov.rb rt.text 12
Alternate austin austin austin austin halostatue gmail com alternate  
austin austin austin