------art_12409_2751170.1144372615710
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On 07/04/06, Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown / gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> You absolutely, positively, can redistribute the software under a later
> version.
>
>
Hmm, I guess Bill Gates is right and GPL is aggresively viral after all :)

It seems weird that if action A is allowable under GPL2 but not under GPL3,
and I repackage Ruby source and release it under GPL3, people who get source
from me can't do action A, but people who get source from the original
location can.

;Daniel

--
Daniel Baird
http://danielbaird.com (TiddlyW;nks! :: Whiteboard Koala :: Blog :: Things
That Suck)
[[My webhost uptime is ~ 92%.. if no answer pls call again later!]]

------art_12409_2751170.1144372615710--