On Mar 29, 2006, at 8:43 AM, vsv wrote:

> |> we'll get 'read' time evaluation too (just dreaming :)
> |
> |We have it today:
> James, you are dreaming too :)

Sorry, I misunderstood what you were asking for.

> btw: why eval in your sample? "#{ruby_code}" is good enough for
> evaluation sample in string;

 >> ruby_code = "2 + 2"
=> "2 + 2"
 >> "2 + 2 = #{ruby_code}"
=> "2 + 2 = 2 + 2"

James Edward Gray II