Avdi Grimm schrieb:
> My question is, has anyone put any thought towards establishing
> conventions for metaprogramming, so that we don't step on each other's
> toes as we add more and more nifty declarative features to Ruby?  Is
> there any interest in such an effort - coming up with an agreeable set
> of conventions for how to apply advice to methods, and how to store
> extension-specific data for objects/classes, and possibly creating a
> library that would hide the details of sticking to the convention?

Jim Weirich schrieb in Re: Rails vs. Ruby Evolution:
> The moral of the story is: You need to be careful in creating libraries 
> that touch the "public" portions of Ruby.  I've been meaning to write 
> down a few guidelines that I tend to follow, but haven't had time yet. 
> I think the time is ripe for someone to codify a "How to play together 
> nicely in Ruby" set of guidelines.

Avdi and Jim, those are great ideas. Sorry, currently I have not more to 
offer, just wanted to support your thoughts :-)

Regards,
Pit