On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, itsme213 wrote:

> <ara.t.howard / noaa.gov> wrote in message
>
>> it is actually configurable.  you do something like
>
> I did not mean a blanket method_missing. My real question was:
> - if I have a conflict with the '*_' convention, &
> - I have another convention that I'd like to use e.g. '*_x'
> would I be able to configure to use that convention?

ah.  no.  however, it would be a 3 minute exercise to add this capability.
would you like me too?

>> this reason this is done is that this class is part of a hierarchy where
>> each subclass adds more traits to parameterize the class.
>
> Is it possible to have different ways of combining up the class/module
> chains? e.g. override? append? other?


hmm.  override is the default.  let me think about append.

regards.

-a
-- 
share your knowledge.  it's a way to achieve immortality.
- h.h. the 14th dali lama