On 3/24/06, Matthew Moss <matthew.moss.coder / gmail.com> wrote:
> Interesting article...  just about the level I needed.  A decent
> example, not uselessly trivial, but not terribly complex either, so I
> can follow enough of the metaprogramming to truly understand what's
> going on.

+1

Great stuff Hal, thanks much.

> Thanks...
>
>
> On 3/24/06, rubyhacker / gmail.com <rubyhacker / gmail.com> wrote:
> > I failed to post this link before, so here it is now:
> >
> >   http://www.devsource.com/article2/0,1895,1928561,00.asp
> >
> > My editor said it "didn't do that well" in terms of page views. And I
> > said,
> > well, I should have posted it to ruby-talk. And she said: Do that now,
> > and we'll see what effect it has.
> >
> > So there you have it. No bots or artificial inflation, please.  ;)
> >
> > This article, by the way, was adapted from a talk given in January
> > to the Austin on Rails group.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Hal
> >
> >
> >
>
>


--
Bill Guindon (aka aGorilla)
The best answer to most questions is "it depends".