Interesting article...  just about the level I needed.  A decent
example, not uselessly trivial, but not terribly complex either, so I
can follow enough of the metaprogramming to truly understand what's
going on.

Thanks...


On 3/24/06, rubyhacker / gmail.com <rubyhacker / gmail.com> wrote:
> I failed to post this link before, so here it is now:
>
>   http://www.devsource.com/article2/0,1895,1928561,00.asp
>
> My editor said it "didn't do that well" in terms of page views. And I
> said,
> well, I should have posted it to ruby-talk. And she said: Do that now,
> and we'll see what effect it has.
>
> So there you have it. No bots or artificial inflation, please.  ;)
>
> This article, by the way, was adapted from a talk given in January
> to the Austin on Rails group.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Hal
>
>
>