On 3/13/06, Trans <transfire / gmail.com> wrote:> Rather then using a specific method for accessing the> singleton/eigennclass, could we just use an alternate to dot-notation.> I.e. Instead of 'x.eigenclass.foo' either 'x:foo' or 'x!foo', or> somthing like that.>> I haven't given a great deal of thought, and don't really have time to,> but it popped into my mind today, so I decided to just throw it out> there.
As long as we don't call it "eigenclass". To pick on your specificproposal, isn't x:foo going to be used for selector namespaces? x!foolooks odd, to me. I'm not opposed to the idea in general, but thenumber of sigils in use in Ruby is already high, and I think I'dprefer a method overall.
-austin--Austin Ziegler * halostatue / gmail.com               * Alternate: austin / halostatue.ca