Berger, Daniel wrote:
>> >> 
>> > to
>> > Here's the latest test case we had for Sydney.  Note that Sydney 
>> http://redhanded.hobix.com/inspect/namedParametersArenTTheyAllNamed.ht
>> > # You can use named parameters, using the name of the parameter
>> Your testcases do not seem to cover the scope completely and 
>>    assert_nothing_raised{ @foo.bar(z:1, x:2, y:3) }
>>   end                                      # test_corner_cases
>> 
>> To cover those.
> 
> Yes, I think this is one of the reasons we started leaning towards using
> '=' instead.  Maybe we should stick with '=>' - no issues with symbols
> or assignment, and people are used to it.

Both problems should be fixed by mandating that there
be a space between foo: and its argument :) What other
parsing issues that might bring is different.

> Regards,
> 
> Dan


E

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.