ara.t.howard / noaa.gov wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
...
>> Try to get that into 2.0, at least flatten_once. *please*.
> 
> agreed.  however i'd strongly go with an api like
> 
> 
> -a

Is that the sound of one API clapping? ;)

Seriously, I cast my vote for flatten having an optional level argument.
(Couldn't this go in 1.8.5. since it wouldn't break anything?)

-- 
      vjoel : Joel VanderWerf : path berkeley edu : 510 665 3407