From: "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis / gmail.com>
> On 2/25/06, Bill Kelly <billk / cts.com> wrote:
> >
> > What I meant, is it's fairly trivial to write wrappers
> > around send/recv that act like gets/puts.  I provided
> > an example of a "puts" version of send in my previous email.
> >
> > It's similarly easy to write a wrapper around recv that
> > acts like "gets".
> 
> 
> why don't you post a gets that is a wrapper of recv? i think that would help
> mitchell a lot. i would do it myself,
> but i am a complete TCP noob. thx in advance.

Hi, I'll be happy to when I get a chance....  Trying to get
this software done in time to send to the people who have
already gotten on the airplane to demo it at the show.  :)


Regards,

Bill