Ilmari Heikkinen ha scritto:

>>Thoughts?
>>
>>Josh
>>
>>[0] http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=286878
> 
> 
> Way to do partial time-limited GC runs would be nice, but no idea about
> feasibility. Run GC for 2ms, then do more stuff, and when alloc limit hit,
> run GC for 2ms again. A single 20ms GC run is a visible glitch, but
> twenty 2ms runs spread over twenty frames is practically invisible.

I think the easier way would be, again, to integrate Bohem's GC, which 
claims incrementality, but matz tryed it many years ago and I recall he 
was'nt satisfied (search ruby-talk for details). Maybe things are changed.