NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote: > Hi, > > > From: Michael Neumann [mailto:neumann / s-direktnet.de] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 9:51 PM > > > NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote: > > > Regards to XML-RPC: I know XML-RPC module works fast and > > > very well, and well documented than SOAP4R (SOAP4R has no > > > document), but I do not know its spec. stability. MNeumann? > > > > 100% XML-RPC specification compliant. > > Very good! I envy you... You don't have to ;-) or is Apache SOAP 100% compliant? No it isn't! > But, I'm sorry for my poor English, how is stability of > XML-RPC specification(not xmlrpc4r implementation)? > No change is scheduled? XML-RPC specification was not changed since 10/16/99. All extensions, such as Intospection or MultiCall are just XML-RPC service handler with a standardized name (e.g. system.multiCall). Regards, Michael -- Michael Neumann merlin.zwo InfoDesign GmbH http://www.merlin-zwo.de