James Edward Gray II wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2006, at 3:57 AM, Luke Blanshard wrote:
>
>> $ ruby loot2.rb 5   4 6 8 9 18 26 34 36 39 40 43 50 55 66 67 76 82 83 
>> 86 91 96
>> 1: 4 8 9 86 96
>> 2: 6 39 67 91
>> 3: 18 26 76 83
>> 4: 55 66 82
>> 5: 34 36 40 43 50
>
> Looks like there are multiple correct splits for this one:
>
> $ ruby loot.rb 5 4 6 8 9 18 26 34 36 39 40 43 50 55 66 67 76 82 83 86 
> 91 96
> 1: 4 6 8 9 18 26 39 43 50
> 2: 34 83 86
> 3: 36 76 91
> 4: 40 67 96
> 5: 55 66 82
>
> James Edward Gray II
>
>

My one produces a similar solution

ruby loot.rb 5 4 6 8 9 18 26 34 36 39 40 43 50 55 66 67 76 82 83 86 91 96

1: 26 86 91
2: 40 67 96
3: 55 66 82
4: 8 36 76 83
5: 4 6 9 18 34 39 43 50