> >    if (cond) {meth this; func that}  #(2)
>
> how about:
>
> (puts 'this'; puts 'that') if true

Thanks for the suggestion.  That may be a good
solution for this particular case.  But, how about

    if condy then pet bush else bash him end #(3)

?  Well, I think our main point is not how we can
come up with a nice looking construct for each case,
but what normal, regular constracts look like.

Regards,
Ryo