On Jan 19, 2006, at 12:40 PM, Mark Volkmann wrote:

> For example, in the Hash class, has_key? = include? = key? = member?
> When I see include? and member? it's not immediately obvious to me
> whether they test whether a given object is present as a key or a
> value. has_key? and key? are more clear and I don't see a benefit to
> having both of them.

That's interesting.  I always use include?() so it doesn't matter if  
I'm dealing with a Hash or an Array.  ;)

I am sure glad we can both have it our way.

James Edward Gray II