Logan Capaldo wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2006, at 8:47 PM, List Recv wrote:
> 
>> -- 
>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>>
> 
> Ok, so change the 'require's to 'load's and then stick it in a
> loop ;). In seriousness though, all the work involved with undefining
> everything, and you might as well just start a new ruby executable.
> Perhaps I'm not understanding you correctly, how would you do this
> with fork, and avoid the overhead of requiring things?

fork would save the overhead of loading ruby itself

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.