On Jan 13, 2006, at 4:59 PM, Austin Ziegler wrote:

> On 13/01/06, James Edward Gray II <james / grayproductions.net> wrote:
>> On Jan 13, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Austin Ziegler wrote:
>>> This is better posted to the Rails list:
>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>> Is it, this time?
>>
>> I know this has become our standard response, but the issue above is
>> a Ruby syntax mistake.  It has nothing to do with Rails.  Is that not
>> squarely in our area of expertise here?
>
> Yes, it's a Ruby syntax mistake. However, it's *not* code that's
> runnable without Rails.

I see a lot of code posted here that requires external libraries and  
we fix that.  Is there a reason Rails is different?

James Edward Gray II